Does Loyalty to Government Equal Patriotism?
by John Matthew Leone
 
In our day the word "patriotic" has been distorted in a magnificent way. It has come to mean "loyalty to our government," or even worse, "loyalty to the Republican Party." It is a great disgrace to our national consciousness that this paradigm shift in language and meaning has occurred.

 
I say this because our current form of government is in open and unashamed rebellion against the lawful restraints of its own operating contract, our Constitution. This unfortunate circumstance does not seem to matter to most people because most Americans have absolutely no idea what the Constitution actually requires from our government. This ignorance has produced a sizeable number of "patriots" who are seemingly ready and willing to defend the illegal and illegitimate activities of politicians who are unfettered by "meager" restrictions like the foundational law of our land. What makes this shift all the more dangerous is that it has been accomplished under the banner of "Americanism."

 
A true patriot is one who is faithful to the founding principles of our land. A true patriot is one that defends the Constitution and refuses to kowtow to the efforts of politicians who are only interested in the expansion consolidation of their own power and unconstitutional beliefs. A true patriot is one who refuses to slavishly support any political party, even if they happen to agree with some of its stated platform.

 
The Christian citizen understands that political parties are comprised of depraved and wicked sinners who will nearly always revert to their basest of instincts. The Christian citizen refuses to enshrine those who are in positions of political power because he believes in the total depravity of all mankind. In our day, it seems as if the vast majority of American Christians believe that only Democrats suffer from the fallen condition of man. Republicans, it seems, are supermen who have been able to transcend the reprobate state into which they were born.

 
Defining patriotism as loyalty to one's ruling government would have been totally alien to the minds of the 18th century colonial revolutionaries that founded our nation. Our Founding Fathers, remember, were the ones who fought stridently against those who were slavishly loyal to the oppressive government they were laboring under at the time. How is it that people who hold to principles that stand in direct opposition to the Founders' views of government can honestly view themselves as "patriotic" in the same sense that the Founders were?

 
But again, we return the problem of ignorance. The vast majority of the American populace either isn't familiar with the writings of the Founders, or they have been taught false applications of their beliefs by those who agree with the modern imperialistic agenda of the Establishmentarian Party that controls our government. For instance, I've heard it been said by Republicrat mouthpieces that Thomas Jefferson believed in the natural and inalienable rights of all men. Therefore, it is the solemn and holy duty of our nation to, by the might of our technologically superior armed forces, spread our form of government forcibly around the globe. While the initial premise is correct, that Jefferson was a champion of the rights of men, such an application is a total distortion of Jeffersonian thought and is an injustice to rational methods of historicism. It is by such methods that "neopatriotism" is birthed in the hearts and minds of American citizens.

 
C. Fred Alford is Professor of Government at the University of Maryland, College Park. Researching one of his books, he interviewed a "high-level government bureaucrat" on the issue of loyalty to government. During the interview, the official made the statement that "if we [the government] didn't have loyalty, nothing would get done in this government." Alford replied, "You know ... loyalty is a virtue. But when someone mentions loyalty like this I always find myself thinking about the Nazis, and [you haven't said] anything to dissuade me." [1]

 
1. C. Fred Alford, Whistleblowers: Broken Lives and Organizational Power (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2001), 9.