| |
Not
Yours To Give
One day in the House of Representatives, a bill was taken up appropriating
money for the benefit of the widow of a distinguished naval officer.
Several beautiful speeches had been made in its support. The Speaker
was just about to put the question when Mr. Crockett arose:
"Mr. Speaker - I have as much respect for the memory of the deceased,
and as much sympathy for the suffering of the living, if suffering
there be, as any man in this house, but we must not permit our respect
for the dead or our sympathy for a part of the living to lead us
into an act of injustice to the balance of the living. I will not
go into an argument to prove that Congress has no power to appropriate
this money as an act of charity. Every member upon this floor knows
it. We have the right, as individuals, to give away as much of our
own money as we please to charity; but as members of Congress we
have no right so to appropriate a dollar of the public money. Some
eloquent appeals have been made to us upon the ground that it is
a debt due the deceased. Mr. Speaker, the deceased lived long after
the close of the war; he was in office to the day of his death,
and I have never heard that the government was in arrears to him.
"Every man in this House knows it is not a debt. We cannot, without
the grossest corruption, appropriate this money as the payment of
a debt. We have not the semblance of authority to appropriate it
as charity. Mr. Speaker, I have said we have the right to give as
much money of our own as we please. I am the poorest man on this
floor. I cannot vote for this bill, but I will give one week's pay
to the object, and, if every member of Congress will do the same,
it will amount to more than the bill asks.
" He took his seat. Nobody replied. The bill was put upon its passage,
and, instead of passing unanimously, as was generally supposed,
and as, not doubt, it would but for that speech, it received but
few votes, and of course was lost.
Later, when asked by a friend why he had opposed the appropriation,
Crockett gave this explanation:
"Several years ago I was one evening standing on the steps of the
Capitol with some other members of Congress, when our attention
was attracted by a great light over Georgetown. It was evidently
a large fire. We jumped into a hack and drove over as fast as we
could. In spite of all that could be done, many houses were burned
and many families made homeless, and, besides, some of them had
lost all but the clothes they had on. The next morning a bill was
introduced appropriating $20,000 for their relief. We put aside
all other business and rushed it through as soon as it could be
done.
"The next summer, when it began to be time to think about the election,
I concluded I would take a scout around among the boys of my district.
I had no opposition there, but, as the election was some time off,
I did not know what might turn up. When riding one day in a part
of the my district in which I was more a stranger than any other,
I saw a man in a field plowing and coming toward the road. I gauged
my gait so that we should meet as he came to the fence. I spoke
to the man. He replied politely, but, as I thought, rather coldly.
"I began: 'Well, friend, I am one of those unfortunate beings call
candidates, and---'
"'Yes, I know you; you are Colonel Crockett. I have seen you once
before, and voted for you the last time you were elected. I suppose
you are out electioneering now, but you had better not waste your
time or mine. I shall not vote for you again.'
"This was a sockdolager...I begged him to tell me what was the
matter.
"'Well, Colonel, it is hardly worth-while to waste time or words
upon it. I do not see how it can be mended, but you had a vote last
winter which shows that either you have not capacity to understand
the Constitution, or that you are wanting in the honesty and firmness
to be guided by it. In either case you are not the man to represent
me. But I beg you pardon for expressing it in that way. I did not
intend to avail myself of the privilege of the constituent to speak
plainly to a candidate for the purpose of insulting or wounding
you. I intended by it only to say that your understanding of the
Constitution is very different from mine; and I will say to you
that, but for my rudeness, I should not have said that I believe
you to be honest...But an understanding of the Constitution different
from mine in I cannot overlook, because of the Constitution, to
be worth anything, must be held sacred, and rigidly observed in
all its provisions. The man who wields power and misinterprets it
is the more dangerous the more honest he is.'
"'I admit the truth of all you say, but there must be some mistake
about it, for I do not remember that I gave any vote last winter
upon any Constitutional question.'
"'No, Colonel, there's no mistake. Though I live here in the backwoods
and seldom go from home, I take the papers from Washington and read
very carefully all the proceedings in Congress. My papers say that
last winter you voted for a bill to appropriate $20,000 to some
sufferers by a fire in Georgetown. Is that true?'
"'Well, my friend, I may as well own up. You have got me there.
But certainly nobody will complain that a great and rich country
likes ours should give the insignificant sum of $20,000 to relieve
its suffering women and children, particularly with a full and overflowing
Treasury, and I am sure, if you had been there, you would have done
just as I did.'
"'It is not the amount, Colonel, that I complain of; it is the
principle. In the first place, the government ought to have in the
Treasury no more than enough for its legitimate purposes. But that
has nothing to do with the question. The power of collecting and
disbursing money at pleasure is the most dangerous power that can
be entrusted to man, particularly under our system of collecting
revenue by tariff, which reaches every man in the country, no matter
how poor he may be, and the poorer he is the more he pays in proportion
to his means. What is worse, it presses upon him without his knowledge
where the weight centers, for there is not a man in the United States
who can ever guess how much he pays to the government. So you see,
that while you are contributing to relieve one, you are drawing
it from thousands who are even worse off then he. If you had the
right to give anything, the amount was simple a matter of discretion
with you, and you had as much right to give $20,000,000 as $20,000.
If you have the right to give to one, you have the right to give
to all; and, as the Constitution neither defines charity nor stipulates
the amount, you are at liberty to give to any thing and everything
which you may believe, or profess to believe, is a charity, and
to any amount you may think proper. You will very easily perceived
what a wide door this would open for fraud and corruption and favoritism,
on the one hand, and for robbing the people on the other. No, Colonel,
Congress has no right to give charity. Individual members may give
as much of their own money as they please, but they have not right
to touch a dollar of the public money for that purpose. If twice
as many houses had been burned in this country as in Georgetown,
neither you nor any other member of congress would have thought
of appropriating a dollar for our relief. There are about two hundred
and forty members of Congress. If they had shown their sympathy
for the sufferers by contribution each one week's pay, it would
have made over $13,000. There are plenty of men in and around Washington
who could have given $20,000 without depriving themselves of even
a luxury of life. The congressmen chose to keep their own money,
which, if reports be true, some of them spend not very creditably;
and the people about Washington, no doubt, applauded you for relieving
them from the necessity of giving by giving what was not yours to
give. The people have delegated to Congress, by the Constitution,
the power to do certain things. To do these, it is authorized to
collect and pay moneys, and for nothing else. Everything beyond
this is usurpation, and a violation of the Constitution.
"'So you see, Colonel, you have violated the Constitution in what
I consider a vital point. It is a precedent fraught with danger
to the country, for when Congress once begins to stretch its power
beyond the limits of the Constitution, there is no limit to it,
and no security for the people. I have no doubt you acted honestly,
but that does not make it any better, except as far as you are personally
concerned, and you see that I cannot vote for you.'
"I tell you I felt streaked. I saw if I should have opposition,
and this man should go to talking, he would set other to talking,
and in that district I was a gone fawn-skin. I could not answer
him, for the fact is, I was so fully convinced that he was right,
I did not want to. But I must satisfy him, and I said to him:
'Well, my friend, you hit the nail upon the head when you said
I did not have sense enough to understand the Constitution. I intended
to be guided by it, and thought I had studied it fully. I have heard
many speeches in Congress about the powers of Congress, but what
you have said here at your plow has got more hard, sound sense in
it than all the find speeches I ever heard. If I had ever taken
the view of it that you have, I would have put my head into the
fire before I would have given that vote; and if I ever vote for
another unconstitutional law I wish I may be shot.'
"He laughingly replied: 'Yes Colonel, you have sworn to that once
before, but I will trust you again upon one condition. You say that
you are convinced that your vote was wrong. Your acknowledgement
of it will do more good than beating you for it. If, as you go around
this district, you will tell people about this vote, and that you
are satisfied that it was wrong, I will not only vote for you, but
I will do what I can to keep down opposition, and perhaps, I may
exert a little influence in that way.'
"'If I don't,' said I, 'I wish I may be shot; and to convince you
that I am earnest in what I say I will come back this way in a week
or ten days, and if you will get up a gathering of people, I will
make a speech to them. Get up a barbecue, and I will pay for it.'
"'No, Colonel, we are not rich people in this section, but we have
plenty of provisions to contribute to a barbecue, and some to share
for those who have none. The push of crops will be over in a few
days, and we can then afford a day for a barbecue. This is Thursday;
I will see to getting up on Saturday week,. Come to my house on
Friday, and we will go together, and I promise you a very respectable
crowed to see and hear you.'
"'Well, I will be here. But one thing more before I say good-bye.
I must know your name.'
"'My name is Bunce.'
"Not Horatio Bunce?'
"'Yes.'
"'Well, Mr. Bunce, I never saw you before thought you say you have
seen me, but I know you very well. I am glad I have met you, and
very proud that I may hope to have you for my friend.'
"It was one of the luckiest hits of my life that I met him. He
mingled but little with the public, but was widely known for his
remarkable intelligence and incorruptible integrity, and for a heart
brimful and running over with kindness and benevolence, which showed
themselves not only in words by in acts. He was the oracle of the
whole country around him, and his fame had extended far beyond the
circle of his immediate acquaintance. Though I had never met him
before, I had heard much of him, and but for this meeting it is
very likely I should have had opposition, and had been beaten. One
thing is very certain, no man could now stand up in this distinct
under such a vote.
"At the appointed time I was at this house having told our conversation
to every crowd I had met, and to every man I stayed all night with,
and found that it gave the people an interest and a confidence in
me stronger than I had ever seen manifested before.
Though I was considerable fatigued when I reach his house, and,
under ordinary circumstance, should have gone early to bed, I kept
up until midnight, talking about the principles and affairs of government,
and got more real, true knowledge of them than I had got all my
life before.
I have known and seen much of him since, for I respect him -- no,
that is not the word -- I reverence and love him more than any living
man, and I go to see him two or three times a year; and I will tell
you sir, if everyone who professes to be a Christian, lived and
acted and enjoyed it as he does, the religion of Christ would take
the world by storm.
"But to return to my story. The next morning we went to the barbecue,
and , to my surprise, found about a thousand men there. I met a
good many whom I had not known before, and they and my friend introduced
me around until I had got pretty well acquainted -- at least, they
all knew me.
"In due time notice was given that I would speak to them. They
gathered up around a stand that had been erected. I open my speech
by saying:
"'Fellow-citizens --- I present myself before you today feeling
like a new man. My eyes have lately been opened to truths which
ignorance or prejudices, or both, had heretofore hidden from my
view. I feel that I can today offer you the ability to render you
more valuable service than I have ever been able to render before.
I am here today more for the purpose of acknowledging my error than
to seek your votes. That I should make this acknowledgment is due
to myself as well as to you. Whether you will vote for me is a matter
for you consideration only.'
"I went on to tell them about the fire and my vote for the appropriation
and then told them way I was satisfied to was wrong. I closed by
saying:
"'And now, fellow-citizens, it remains only for me to tell you
that the most of the speech you have listened to with so much interest
was simply a repetition of the arguments by which your neighbor,
Mr. Bunce, convinced me of my error.
It is the best speech I ever made in my life, but he is entitled
to the credit for it. And now I hope he is satisfied with his convert
and that he will get up here and tell you so.'
"He came upon the stand and said:
'Fellow-citizens --- It affords me great pleasure to comply with
the request of Colonel Crockett. I have always considered him a
thoroughly honest man, and I am satisfied that he will faithfully
perform all that he has promised you today.'
"He went down, and there went up from that crowd such a shout for
Davey Crockett as his name never called forth before.
"I am not much given to tears, but I was taken with a choking
then and felt some big drops rolling down my cheeks. And I tell
you now that the remembrance of those few words spoken by such a
man, and the honest, hearty shout they produced, is worth more to
me than all the repetition I have ever made, or shall ever make,
as a member of Congress.
"Now, sir," concluded Crockett, "you know why I made that speech
yesterday.
There is one thing now to which I wish to call to your attention.
You remember that I proposed to give a week's pay. There are in
that House many very wealthy men --- men who think nothing of spending
a week's pay, or a dozen of them, for a dinner or a wine party when
they have something to accomplish by it. Some of those same men
made beautiful speeches upon the great debt of gratitude which the
country owed the deceased -- a debt which could not be paid by money
--- and the insignificance and worthlessness of money, particularly
so insignificant a sum as $10,000 when weighed against the honor
of the nation. Yet not one of them responded to my proposition.
Money with them is nothing but trash when it is to come out of the
people but it is the one great thing for which most of them are
striving, and many of them sacrifice honor, integrity, and justice
to obtain it." --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
David Crocket was born August 17, 1786, at Limestone (Greene County),
Tennessee. He died March 6, 1836, as a defender of the Alamo.
|